Pubmed (google scholar)

Video: Google Schola

Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searche

Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary

  1. Google Scholar articles had a higher median number of citations (34 vs. 1.5, P < 0.0001) and came from higher impact factor journals (5.17 vs. 3.55, P = 0.036). Conclusions: PubMed searches and Google Scholar searches often identify different articles. In this study, Google Scholar articles were more likely to be classified as relevant, had.
  2. methods: Literature search of the medical scientific databases as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus is performed with key words psoriasis, comorbidity, cost of therapy. Total of 58 publications were.
  3. ator. Only Google knows its total number of records and names and.
  4. Purpose of review: This review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications. Recent findings: Abundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis and LP-PRP.
  5. The four most popular search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Google Scholar are investigated to assess which search engine is most effective for literature research in laser medicine. Their search features are described and the results of a performance test are compared according to the criteria (1) recall, (2) precision, and (3) importance

PubMed and Google Scholar are accessed for free. The keyword search with PubMed offers optimal update frequency and includes online early articles; other databases can rate articles by number of. [PMC free article] [Google Scholar] 18. Hauser W., Schug S., Furlan A.D. The opioid epidemic and national guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain: A perspective from different continents. Pain Rep. 2017; 2:e599. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000599. [PMC free article]. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science origi-nate from the United States, whereas Scopus originates from Europe. PubMed and Google Scholar are free and provide open access to all interested clinicians, re-searchers, and trainees and also to the public in gen-eral. Scopus and Web of Science are databases tha Google Scholar searches full text of articles but PubMed and Web of Science search only the citation, abstract, and tagging information. Because Google Scholar searches the full text of articles, you can find information that is not necessarily in the citation or abstract of an article, for instance, a detail buried in the Methods section of a. PubMed and Google Scholar are free and provide open access to all interested clinicians, researchers, and trainees and also to the public in general. Scopus and Web of Science are databases that belong to commercial providers and require an access fee. Regarding Google Scholar, although relevant data are not summarized anywhere, the database is.

Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and

Critical Care Medicine

ing Google Scholar (GS) and PubMed. Google Scholar and PubMed are the two most popular free academic search tools in biology and chemistry, with GS being the number one search tool in the world. T hose academics using GS as their prin-cipal system for literature searches may be unaware of research which enumerate Introduction. Prolactinoma is usually a benign tumor that appears as a result of the monoclonal expansion of a cell line of lactotrope cells of the adenohypophysis, probably due to somatic mutations. 1 It is the most common pituitary tumor (∼50%) and usually appears in women aged 20-50 years, with a female:male ratio of 10:1 in that period. Its annual incidence is 6-10 cases per million.

Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and

in PubMed, whereas in Google Scholar, because of the highnumberofsearchresults,weconductedauthorsearches within the topic searches. Still, sensitivity was similar be-tween the 2 search engines. In contrast to PubMed, Google Scholar searches a wide range of multidisciplinary topics and offers few options for filtering large amounts of information PubMed had better precision than Google Scholar for both overall search results (13% vs 0.07%, P < .001) and full-text results (8% vs 0.05%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PubMed searches with the Clinical Queries filter are more precise than with the Advanced Scholar Search in Google Scholar for respiratory care topics PUBMED & GOOGLE SCHOLAR Alessia Romagnoli 17/10/2019 VAKGROEP GE55 -KENNISCENTRUM VOOR DE GEZONDHEIDSZORG GENT. Blits informatiesessies •Doelgroep: studenten en personeel •Korte, vrijblijvende sessies •Basiskennis en vaardigheden •Thema's: wetenschappelijk schrijven, statistisch Some unique Google Scholar items (10 items, 4.05%) appeared in journals not indexed by PubMed. Google Scholar covered a wider date range and re-turned 4 items (1.62%) older than 1950 that were not in PubMed. Google Scholar retrieved items based on its ability to search the full text of many articles rather than sole-ly on citation data No significant differences were found for the mean number of target primary literature articles located within the first 100 citations in Google Scholar and PubMed searches (5.1 ± 3.9 vs 5.3 ± 3.3; p = 0.868). Google Scholar searches located more total results than PubMed (2211.6 ± 3999.5 vs 44.2 ± 47.4; p = 0.019)

Medical Literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar

  1. Google Scholar propose le comptage du nombre de citations d'un article à partir de son index (1 ) ainsi que celui du Web of Science (2 ).Chacun des liens renvoient vers la liste des articles référents. Il est aussi possible d'avoir directement une liste de références citant un article en utilisant son DOI dans l'URL de la requête
  2. The usefulness of Google Scholar (GS) as a bibliographic database for biomedical systematic review (SR) searching is a subject of current interest and debate in research circles. Recent research has suggested GS might even be used alone in SR searching. This assertion is challenged here by testing whether GS can locate all studies included in 21 previously published SRs
  3. Google Scholar's retrieval may present older primary literature first in the list of links because of the number of times the links have been clicked and the number of times the articles were cited, whereas the PubMed default is to present the most current citations first [1]

Google Scholar vs. PubMed for Health Sciences Literature ..

Google Scholar articles had a higher median number of citations (34 vs. 1.5, P < 0.0001) and came from higher impact factor journals (5.17 vs. 3.55, P = 0.036). Conclusions. PubMed searches and Google Scholar searches often identify different articles [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 85. Tanumihardjo S.A., Olson J.A. The reproducibility of the modified relative dose response (mrdr) assay in healthy individuals over time and its comparison with conjunctival impression cytology (cic) Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;45:407-411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 86

PubMed Central Google Scholar 28. Nourbakhsh E, Nugent R, Wang H, Cevik C, Nugent K: Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar. Health Info Libr J. 2012, 29 (3): 214-222. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00992.x. Article PubMed Google Scholar 29 CAS PubMed Google Scholar 93. Burke LM, Gollan RA, Read RS. Dietary intakes and food use of groups of elite Australian male athletes. Int J Sport Nutr 1991; 1 (4): 378-94. CAS PubMed Google Scholar 94. Burke LM, Read R. Food use and nutritional practices of elite Olympic weightlifters 58. 2012. Diverse functional outcomes of Plasmodium falciparum ligation of EPCR: potential implications for malarial pathogenesis. MR Gillrie, M Avril, AJ Brazier, SP Davis, MF Stins, JD Smith, M Ho. Cellular microbiology 17 (12), 1883-1899

CrossRef, Google Scholar & PubMed Enter Search Words Search. Citation Tools. Information about and access to free online referencing and citation tools. Search Google Scholar at https://scholar.google.com.au/. Select the citation tool icon [quotation marks] and choose a referencing style Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes most peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other.

PubMed; Google Scholar; Peppers M.P. Benzodiazepines for alcohol withdrawal in the elderly and in patients with liver disease. Pharmacotherapy. 1996; 16: 49-57. View in Article PubMed; Google Scholar; Chick J. Review: benzodiazepines are more effective than neuroleptics in reducing delirium and seizures in alcohol withdrawal.. Google Scholar (GS) is a free academic search engine that can be thought of as the academic version of Google. Rather than searching all of the indexed information on the web, it searches repositories of publishers, universities or scholarly websites. This is generally a smaller subset of the pool that Google searches 2006;35:33-39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 105.Snaar-Jagalska BE. ZF-CANCER: developing high-throughput bioassays for human cancers in zebrafish. Zebrafish. 2009;6:441-443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 106.Spoorendonk KM, Peterson-Maduro J, Renn J, Trowe T, Kranenbarg S, Winkler C, Schulte-Merker S. Retinoic acid and Cyp26b1 are critical regulators of osteogenesis in the axial skeleton Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Diverticulitis. Diverticulitis is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that is associated with significant morbidity and health care costs. Approximately 20% of patients with incident diverticulitis have at least 1 recurrence. Complications of diverticulitis, such as abdominal sepsis, are less.

Die Google-Scholar-Artikel waren im Median 34-mal zitiert, die PubMed-Beiträge 1,5-mal (p 0,0001). Dies lässt sich zum Teil mit der Suchstrategie von Google Scholar erklären, eventuell auch. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 34 (4), 941-946. , 2011. 13. 2011. Deconvolution with simple extrapolation for improved cerebral blood flow measurement in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging during acute ischemic stroke. ME MacDonald, MR Smith, R Frayne PubMed. Google Scholar. Jean-Paul Aubert. Jean-Paul Aubert Unité Physiologie Cellulaire, Département des Biotechnologies, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. Google Scholar. Crossref. Search ADS. PubMed PubMed Google Scholar Crossref. 2. Hersh AL, Chambers HF, Maselli JH, Gonzales R. National trends in ambulatory visits and antibiotic prescribing for skin and soft-tissue infections. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(14):1585-1591.

Google Scholar Alternatives. Google Scholar is described as 'freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines' and is an website in the Education & Reference category. There are more than 10 alternatives to Google Scholar, not only websites but also apps for a variety of platforms, including iPhone. Measles is a highly contagious disease that results from infection with measles virus and is still responsible for more than 100 000 deaths every year, down from more than 2 million deaths annually before the introduction and widespread use of measles vaccine. Measles virus is transmitted by the respiratory route and illness begins with fever, cough, coryza, and conjunctivitis followed by a. Science 348 (6235), 648-660. , 2015. 3106. 2015. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. K Ye, MH Schulz, Q Long, R Apweiler, Z Ning. Bioinformatics 25 (21), 2865-2871. , 2009

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 23 Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition. ‪Assistant Professor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI), McMaster‬ - ‪‪Cited by 98‬‬ - ‪Health systems‬ - ‪Public health‬ - ‪Health promotion‬ - ‪Family medicine Twenty-four participants (males n= 8 and females n= 16) volunteered to participate in this study and were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Resistance training only (RT), where they performed 4 upper and lower body split workouts a week, Intermittent Fasting only (IMF), this group consumed calories in an 8 hour window while maintaining normal free living activity, and Intermittent.

View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Tabata T, et al. Zika virus targets different primary human placental cells, suggesting two routes for vertical transmission. Cell Host Microbe . 2016;20(2):155-166 An electronic search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases from January 2000 to February 2021 was performed. An initial search of the databases identified a total of 864 documents, and after a careful process of screening and selection, 14 studies were included in this systematic review and processed for data extraction

[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]Xaus J, Comalada M, Valledor A, Lloberas J, Lpez-Soriano F, Argils J, Bogdan C, Celada A. a sophisticated immune system respons PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 38. Neves J, Nobre MA, Oliveira EP, Santos JM, Malo P. Risk factors for implant failure and peri‐implant pathology in systemic compromised patients CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar . 2. Chan, C. K. F. et al. Identification and specification of the mouse skeletal stem cell. Cell 160, 285-298 (2015). CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar . 3. Kenyon, C. J. The genetics of ageing. Nature 464, 504-512 (2010). ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar . 4 Methods and analysis Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework will be used to guide the conduct of this scoping review. We will conduct a search of the literature on the electronic databases: Medline, (using PubMed interface), EMBASE, EBSCOHOST, Web of Science and Google Scholar, grey literature sources and the reference lists of key studies to identify studies. PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched periodically from October 2017 to July 2020. Results Our proposed conceptual model lays out the determinants and outcomes of nurses' workplace social capital and specifies the relational statements among these concepts

PubMed Google Scholar 5. Rebellato J, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Isaacson RJ, Davidovitch M, Vroom K. Lower arch perimeter preservation using the lingual arch. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112:449-56. Article Google Scholar 6. Brennan MM, Gianelly AA Access PubMed or Google Scholar from the Library web pages to find full text.; Search on a topic; In PubMed, click on the article title to see the abstract and the icon; In Google Scholar the findit@WNHS link will appear on the right hand side or under ; Click on the link (or icon) to see if the full text is available from a Library database or print journal Google Scholar's retrieval may present older primary literature first in the list of links because of the number of times the links have been clicked and the number of times the articles were cited, whereas the PubMed default is to present the most current citations first Yes, you can order directly from PubMed, Google Scholar, and over 70 other preferred search environments using the Article Galaxy Widget. Article Galaxy Widget is a browser extension that provides an overlay displaying full-text article prices, rental options when available, and a notice if the document already exists in your holdings or is available through your current subscriptions

Current Clinical Recommendations for Use of - PubMe

Ten-Year Results of Anterior Chamber Fixation of theNonoperative Management of Complete Tracheal Rings

Google Scholar Profile Parser is a PHP library which parses the HTML of a scholar's profile page from Google Scholar website and transforms its data into a regular PHP data structure. php parser statistics publications google-scholar scholar. Updated on Dec 18, 2019 また、BMJにアクセスした検索エンジンの1位はGoogle、2位はGoogle Scholarで、それぞれPubMedの10倍近い頻度であるとのことです(BMJ, 331:1487-1488, 2005 )。 このように、Google Scholarを使った検索はPubMedを使った検索と肩を並べるほどになってきました Google Scholar tries to de-duplicate its search results. It, initially, only shows you the 'hit'/record produced by one source of information about the article/book/resources of interest. If you need a perfect RefWorks record that includes the journal title abbreviation, DOI, PMID, PMCID, etc; you should take the time to look for a Google. Many medical links found in both Google and Google Scholar are from PubMed (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov in search results); however, Scholar accesses only 1 million of the some 15 million records at PubMed.3 Although it enables citation searching, Scholar does not offer a similar pages feature as Google does to find pages on the same subject. Nor. Summary: Google Scholar is great, but its inclusiveness and mix of automatically updated and hand-curated profiles means you should never take any of its numbers at face value. Case in point: the power couple Prof. Et Al and Dr. A. Author, whose profiles I created following Scholar's recommended settings (and a bit of manual embellishment).If you have a Scholar profile, make sure you don't.

Andrew Thaler was the most explicit Google Scholar booster: I have never been in a situation where PubMed was better than Scholar. On the PubMed booster comments, Rob Oakes wrote that Google Scholar includes only part of PubMed index. This I hadn't known, but found that this has indeed been reported in the literature (e.g., Schultz 2007) 医学系論文をアラートで楽して集める (Google Scholar, PubMed, etc.) 次の抄読会、よろしく!. このセリフを恨めしく思う人も多いと思います。. そこからPubMedで数時間かけても、中々良さそうな論文が見つからない。. もちろん論文検索は数をこなせば上達します. PubMed. Google Scholar. Bauke W. Dijkstra, Bauke W. Dijkstra b Laboratory of Biophysical Chemistry, University of Groningen, NL-9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. PubMed. OpenURL Placeholder Text.

It rarely finds all of the reliable material that scholarly databases do, and it sometimes misses really important articles: studies comparing Google Scholar with PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and more found that Google Scholar was unable to produce all of the articles listed in the scholarly databases (Asher, Duke, & Wilson. SUMMARY Filariae of animals, especially those of mammals, often infect humans and typically produce cryptic infections. These zoonotic infections have been reported from virtually all parts of the world including temperate zones. Infections may be symptomatic or not, and the parasites are found in surgical tissue biopsy specimens or, more rarely, are removed intact from superficial sites. The Precision was 59/467 (13%) in PubMed and 57/80,730 (0.07%) in Google Scholar (p<0.001)!! Anders ME, & Evans DP (2010). Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar Literature Searches Google Scholar 71. Teng K., Li M., Yu W., Li H., Shen D., and Liu D.Comparison of PCR with culture for detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in clinical samples from patients with urogenital infections E Alvarez, A Sutton, B Barton, S Vaidya. BMJ open 10 (3), e035862. , 2020. 1. 2020. Feasibility and implementation of a healthy lifestyles program in a community setting in Ontario, Canada: protocol for a pragmatic mixed methods pilot study. E Alvarez, M Qutob, L Mbuagbaw, J Lavis, C Lokker, M Walli-Attaei,.

学术. AI2A 2021. 23-25 July 2021 Guilin, China. AI2A 2021 is dedicated to addressing the challenges in the areas of Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Algorithms as well as its applications, presenting the latest scientific rese. 官方网站 View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar. Cardaci S, et al. Glutamine deprivation enhances antitumor activity of 3-bromopyruvate through the stabilization of monocarboxylate transporter-1. Cancer Res. 2012;72(17):4526-4536. View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar Google Scholar searches located more total results than PubMed (2211.6 ± 3999.5 vs 44.2 ± 47.4; p = 0.019). The availability of free, full-text journal articles per Drug Information Rounds.

PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus or Google Scholar - Which is

This Cited by count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. The ones marked * may be different from the article in the profile. Add co-authors Co-authors. Follow this author. New articles by this author (WalkAlong) using google analytics. MJ Song, J Ward, F Choi, M Nikoo, A Frank, F Shams, K Tabi, D Vigo, JMIR mental. Kim J, Namchuk M, Bugawan T, et al. Higher autoantibody levels and recognition of a linear NH2-terminal epitope in the autoantigen GAD65, distinguish stiff-man syndrome from insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Exp Med. 1994;180(2):595-6067519242PubMed Google Scholar Crossre Rhabdomyolysis is a well-known clinical syndrome of muscle injury associated with myoglobinuria, electrolyte abnormalities, and often acute kidney injury (AKI). The pathophysiology involves injury to the myocyte membrane and/or altered energy production that results in increased intracellular calcium concentrations and initiation of destructive processes PubMed; Google Scholar). It has been hypothesized that GABA A receptors are modulated by such a large number of compounds because the latter can occupy numerous cavities located within the part of the receptor embedded in the membrane (8. Ernst M. Bruckner S. Boresch S. Sieghart W

PubMed Article Google Scholar 2. Omi W, et al. Swallow syncope, a case report and review of the literature. Cardiology. 2006;105(2):75-9. PubMed Article Google Scholar 3. Engelhardt W, Kotlarek F, von Bernuth G. Deglutition syncope in childhood with complete atrioventricular block Functional abdominal pain syndrome (FAPS) differs from the other functional bowel disorders; it is less common, symptoms largely are unrelated to food intake and defecation, and it has higher comorbidity with psychiatric disorders. The etiology and pathophysiology are incompletely understood. Because FAPS likely represents a heterogenous group of disorders, peripheral neuropathic pain. Synesthesia is a rare experience where one property of a stimulus evokes a second experience not associated with the first. For example, in lexical-gustatory synesthesia words evoke the experience of tastes (Ward and Simner, 2003). There are at least sixty known variants of synesthesia (Day, 2013), including reports of synesthetic experiences of colour (Baron-Cohen, Wyke and Binnie, 1987.

A bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is a communication between the pleural space and the bronchial tree. Although rare, BPFs represent a challenging management problem and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. By far, the postoperative complication of pulmonary resection is the most common cause, followed by lung necrosis complicating infection, persistent spontaneous pneumothorax. PubMed Article Google Scholar 70. Copas JB, Shi JQ. A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10:251-65. CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar 71. International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) We searched the search engines such as PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for articles published from March 2020 to October 2020. Data pertaining to the impact of COVID-19 on renal patients and the referral system were extracted from the various published narrative reviews and the guidelines of the professional organisations Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess neuromuscular performance capabilities over an in-season mesocycle in early-career professional soccer players and examine the relationship with training workload.Methods: Neuromuscular performance capabilities (isometric knee extensor: peak force, rate of force development, and peak twitch force) of 12 professional soccer players were assessed. The article narratively reviewed original and review articles available on PubMed and Google Scholar related to the theme to provide up-to-date information. The different templates developed and studied for COVID-19 vaccines include the whole-virus vaccine, viral vector vaccine, nucleic acid (deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid), and.

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google

RESULTS. Of 105 ESBS procedures analyzed, 36 preceded and 69 followed implementation of cost feedback. There were no significant differences in patient age (p = 0.064), sex (p = 0.489), surgical indication (p = 0.389), or OR anesthesia time (p = 0.51) for patients treated before and after implementation

Immortalized keratinocyte lines derived from humanIntensification for redesigned and sustainableHigh-Dose Vancomycin Therapy for Methicillin-ResistantCauses and Outcomes of Acute Neuromuscular RespiratoryAnterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography as aAssessment of Severe Malnutrition Among Hospitalized